Reading Time: 3 minutes

Building a successful organization demands a strategic mindset. In Part 1 of this guide, we introduced you to frameworks that help you understand your market and competition. Now, we’ll explore powerful tools that streamline planning and execution. Get ready to learn about the VMOST analysis, Business Model Canvas, and more. These frameworks will empower you to align your strategies, clarify goals, and achieve the growth your business deserves.

5 – VMOST ANALYSIS

VMOST is an acronym for Vision, Mission, Objectives, Strategy, and Tactics. VMOST Analysis evaluates whether a strategy and its supporting activities are aligned. You can use it for current strategies or to make plans in the future. The key benefit is the way that this framework allows users to break down the core components of a strategy into a format that is easy to consume.

By presenting a strategy in the VMOST model, you empower your team to identify areas that are out of alignment and how they fit within your business.

Pros:

  • Assists in communicating strategy clearly.
  • Promotes a universal understanding of the focus and direction.
  • Once misalignments are clarified, users can eliminate them.

Cons:

  • Adding other tools is necessary to make VMOST strategy useful.
  • Lacks a formal scoring method to accurately compare different strategies and make a decision about the right approach.

Example:

A tech startup outlines its compelling vision, measurable objectives, specific methods to achieve them, necessary skills and resources, and a defined timeline.

6 – BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS

Business Model Canvas is a strategic management tool that allows users to design, describe, invent, challenge, and pivot their business models. It simplifies the story of your business model in a way that makes it easy to communicate clearly. You can also leverage Business Model Canvas to deftly manage a portfolio of business models, design new business models, and switch between “exploit” and “explore” business models.

Pros:

  • Offers an easy-to-understand and communicate business model in a single visual format.
  • Breaks down silos to encourage collaboration between teams by involving all stakeholders.
  • Adaptable to different kinds of customer groups, industries, and businesses.

Cons:

  • Can be challenging for users who lack prior knowledge of business modeling terminology and concepts.
  • The visual nature of the framework runs the risk of oversimplifying a business model’s complexity.
  • Does not provide detailed guidance on how to execute or implement the business model.

Example:

Consider a scenario in which an entrepreneur sketches out their new venture’s key partners, customer segments, value propositions, and revenue streams on a single canvas.

7 – GAP ANALYSIS

Gap Analysis framework measures expected results against actual results to identify missing or suboptimal skills, technologies, processes, or strategies. The distance between expected and actual results constitutes the gap. This framework is an excellent approach for course-correcting future efforts to achieve company goals. By comparing current results with desired results, users can pinpoint what they need to focus on to improve the organization’s performance in certain areas.

Pros:

  • Revealing shortcomings and weaknesses to address.
  • Supporting better decision-making by providing accurate information.
  • Allowing better prioritization of business needs.

Cons:

  • Successful completion of a gap analysis is heavily dependent on the dedication and knowledge of the employees who perform the process.
  • Complexities and the root cause of a gap can be overlooked if the analysis is too shallow.
  • With the environment shifting constantly, as it does in fast-moving industries or large companies, the analysis can have inaccuracies.

Example:

A company compares its current sales figures to its ambitious target goals, identifying areas where improvement is needed to reach objectives.

8 – SWOT ANALYSIS

SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. You can leverage this framework to analyze your organization’s current situation as you decide what strategies to use. To do so, you lay out the four parts of the framework in four quadrants. You should kick off the process by meeting with people from each department in your business in a brainstorming session. During this session, attendees will come up with ideas for each quadrant.

Pros:

  • Can support several different project objectives.
  • Maintains a neutral approach whether product development, business development, competitive analysis, opportunity analysis, or strategic planning is involved.
  • The four elements provide a well-rounded and comprehensive view of the objective’s chances of success.

Cons:

  • Lacks a mechanism to rank the significance of each factor compared to the others.
  • The one-dimensional model simplifies each problem attribute as a strength, weakness, opportunity, or threat without considering that some could fall into more than one of these categories.
  • Follows a subjective process that reflects the bias of those involved in brainstorming and data collection.

Example:

Imagine a scenario where a pharmaceutical company lists its strong R&D team (strength), high cost of drug development (weakness), aging population creating a greater need for medications (opportunity), and patent expirations on existing drugs (threat). 

A FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESS

By following a carefully laid out process, you can ensure that your organization’s marketing and sales strategies continue to be effective from year to year. This is exactly what the frameworks discussed above give you: a blueprint for success.

 

Seeking a polished meeting planner to set up your corporate meeting or event for strategy training? Contact Gavel International for more information.

 

Jim Bozzelli